Flexible for Whom? Caregiving Visibility, I-Deals, and Gendered Career Progression in Hybrid Work
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61424/rjbe.v3i4.1040Keywords:
Hybrid Work, Caregiving Visibility, I-Deals, Flexibility Stigma, Gendered Organizations, Promotion, Work-Family ConflictAbstract
Flexible work is often presented as a way to include, retain and achieve gender equality. However, there exist alternative pathways to creating new forms of inequality when an employee is visibly associated with care giving. This study investigates the interaction between caring visibility and flexibility i-deals and career advancement in Hybrid workplaces. It is based on the concepts of i-deals theory, flexibility stigma and gendered organizations theory. By proposing to connect visibility of caregiving with individualized flexibility to promotion, through manager-rated commitment and employee experiences of visibility penalties, the model has implications that extend beyond the day-to-day work of managers and caregivers.The proposed model not only resonates in the daily work of managers and caregivers but also has implications that go beyond that. The study is conducted on a three-wave matched employee-manager dyad design, objective human resource records, and a nested interview sample over 24 months.The study is designed through a three-wave matched employee-manager dyad design that is based on objective human resource records and a nested interview sample over a period of 24 months. For this manuscript build no raw data was provided and hence the numerical results reported are simulated and should be replaced in the manuscript before submission. As illustrated, the results present a twofold situation. Flexibility i-deals help to minimize work-family conflict. When caregiving is very visible, the same arrangements are associated with fewer chances for promotion and greater visibility penalties, however. Such effects are greater in females. These qualitative themes support this pattern, and indicate that hybrid working does not eradicate ideal-worker norms. Rather, these norms shift to judging responsiveness, availability and promotability. The study makes a contribution to the literature by demonstrating the possibility for flexibility to serve as a support and as a gendered signal to the work market at the same time.
References
Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender & Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
Acker, J. (2006). Inequality Regimes: Gender, Class, and Race in Organizations. Gender & Society, 20(4), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243206289499
Alkhyeli, A., & Hazmilah, H. (2025). Performance Appraisal Effectiveness in Modern Organisations: A Systematic Review of Outcomes, Moderators, and Contextual Factors. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 15(9), Pages 170-193. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i9/26461
Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How Effective Is Telecommuting? Assessing the Status of Our Scientific Findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
Allen, T. D., Johnson, R. C., Kiburz, K. M., & Shockley, K. M. (2013). Work–Family Conflict and Flexible Work Arrangements: Deconstructing Flexibility. Personnel Psychology, 66(2), 345–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012
Bloom, N., Han, R., & Liang, J. (2024). Hybrid working from home improves retention without damaging performance. Nature, 630(8018), 920–925. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07500-2
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2014). Consequences of Flexibility Stigma Among Academic Scientists and Engineers. Work and Occupations, 41(1), 86–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888413515497
Chung, H., & Van Der Lippe, T. (2020). Flexible Working, Work–Life Balance, and Gender Equality: Introduction. Social Indicators Research, 151(2), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-018-2025-x
Correll, S. J., Benard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297–1339. https://doi.org/10.1086/511799
Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of Conflict between Work and Family Roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.2307/258214
Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Lemmon, G. (2009). Bosses’ Perceptions of Family-Work Conflict and Women’s Promotability: Glass Ceiling Effects. Academy of Management Journal, 52(5), 939–957. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.44633700
Hornung, S., Rousseau, D. M., & Glaser, J. (2008). Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 655–664. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.655
Kelly, C. M., Rofcanin, Y., Las Heras, M., Ogbonnaya, C., Marescaux, E., & Bosch, M. J. (2020). Seeking an “i-deal” balance: Schedule-flexibility i-deals as mediating mechanisms between supervisor emotional support and employee work and home performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103369
Kossek, E. E., Thompson, R. J., & Lautsch, B. A. (2015). Balanced Workplace Flexibility: Avoiding the Traps. California Management Review, 57(4), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2015.57.4.5
Lamar, M. R., Forbes, L. K., & Capasso, L. A. (2019). Helping Working Mothers Face the Challenges of an Intensive Mothering Culture. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 41(3), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.41.3.02
Las Heras, M., Rofcanin, Y., Matthijs Bal, P., & Stollberger, J. (2017). How do flexibility i-deals relate to work performance? Exploring the roles of family performance and organizational context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(8), 1280–1294. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2203
Leslie, L. M., Manchester, C. F., Park, T.-Y., & Mehng, S. A. (2012). Flexible Work Practices: A Source of Career Premiums or Penalties? Academy of Management Journal, 55(6), 1407–1428. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0651
Liao, C., Wayne, S. J., & Rousseau, D. M. (2016). Idiosyncratic deals in contemporary organizations: A qualitative and meta‐analytical review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(S1). https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1959
Mas, A., & Pallais, A. (2017). Valuing Alternative Work Arrangements. American Economic Review, 107(12), 3722–3759. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20161500
Munsch, C. L. (2016). Flexible Work, Flexible Penalties: The Effect of Gender, Childcare, and Type of Request on the Flexibility Bias. Social Forces, 94(4), 1567–1591. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sov122
Naveed, R. T., Alhaidan, H., Halbusi, H. A., & Al-Swidi, A. K. (2022). Do organizations really evolve? The critical link between organizational culture and organizational innovation toward organizational effectiveness: Pivotal role of organizational resistance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100178
Reid, E. (2015). Embracing, Passing, Revealing, and the Ideal Worker Image: How People Navigate Expected and Experienced Professional Identities. Organization Science, 26(4), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2015.0975
Rousseau, D. M. (2015). I-deals, idiosyncratic deals employees bargain for themselves. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315703589
Rousseau, D. M., Ho, V. T., & Greenberg, J. (2006). I-Deals: Idiosyncratic Terms in Employment Relationships. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 977–994. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527470
Subramaniam, A., & Mehta, K. K. (2024). Exploring the Lived Experiences of Caregiving for Older Family Members by Young Caregivers in Singapore: Transition, Trials, and Tribulations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 21(2), 182. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21020182
Vartiainen, M., & Vanharanta, O. (2023). Hybrid work: Definition, origins, debates and outlook. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12847.71844
Williams, J. C., Blair‐Loy, M., & Berdahl, J. L. (2013). Cultural Schemas, Social Class, and the Flexibility Stigma. Journal of Social Issues, 69(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12012
Yang, L., Holtz, D., Jaffe, S., Suri, S., Sinha, S., Weston, J., Joyce, C., Shah, N., Sherman, K., Hecht, B., & Teevan, J. (2021). The effects of remote work on collaboration among information workers. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01196-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdullah Mohammad Yeaqubi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
